Gregory Meeks
- NYNew York
- District 5 Representative

Gregory Meeks (D)
New YorkDistrict 5 RepresentativeOffice:
2310 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-3205
Memberships:
- House Committee on Financial Services
- House Committee on Foreign Affairs
Terms:
- 2025 to 2027 - NY District 5 Representative
- 2023 to 2025 - NY District 5 Representative
- 2021 to 2023 - NY District 5 Representative
- 2019 to 2021 - NY District 5 Representative
- 2017 to 2019 - NY District 5 Representative
- 2015 to 2017 - NY District 5 Representative
- 2013 to 2015 - NY District 5 Representative
- 2011 to 2013 - NY District 6 Representative
- 2009 to 2011 - NY District 6 Representative
- 2007 to 2009 - NY District 6 Representative
- 2005 to 2007 - NY District 6 Representative
- 2003 to 2005 - NY District 6 Representative
- 2001 to 2003 - NY District 6 Representative
- 1999 to 2001 - NY District 6 Representative
- 1997 to 1999 - NY District 6 Representative
Add An Item To Gregory Meeks's Record
Gregory Meeks's Record on Bitcoin, Cryptocurrencies, and Blockchain
- 4/3/2025, 6:48:41 PM
Positive. +1
Representative Meeks Tweeted or was mentioned:
Click for Tweet Screenshot In Case of Deletion or Edits
Reference LinkSubmitted By: Anonymous - 3/12/2025, 7:10:34 PM
Positive. +1
11-Mar-2025: Gregory Meeks voted FOR H J RES 25 H J RES 25 Title: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to “Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales”
Reference LinkSubmitted By: ElectBitcoin.org Congressional Vote History - 7/11/2024, 4:29:18 PM
Negative. +1
11-Jul-2024: Gregory Meeks voted AGAINST H J RES 109 H J RES 109 Title: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to “Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121”
Reference LinkSubmitted By: ElectBitcoin.org Congressional Vote History - 5/23/2024, 2:41:13 PM
Negative. +1
22-May-2024: Gregory Meeks voted AGAINST H R 4763 H R 4763 Title: Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act
Reference LinkSubmitted By: ElectBitcoin.org Congressional Vote History - 5/16/2024, 9:33:26 PM
Negative. +1
8-May-2024: Gregory Meeks voted AGAINST H J RES 109 H J RES 109 Title: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to “Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121”
Reference LinkSubmitted By: ElectBitcoin.org Congressional Vote History - 6/23/2023, 5:43:01 PM
Positive. +1
Representative Meeks Tweeted or was mentioned:
Click for Tweet Screenshot In Case of Deletion or Edits
Reference LinkSubmitted By: Anonymous - 6/23/2023, 5:41:58 PM
Positive. +1
Representative Meeks Tweeted or was mentioned:
Click for Tweet Screenshot In Case of Deletion or Edits
Reference LinkSubmitted By: Anonymous - 6/23/2023, 5:39:53 PM
Positive. +1
Representative Meeks Tweeted or was mentioned:
Click for Tweet Screenshot In Case of Deletion or Edits
Reference LinkSubmitted By: Anonymous - 2/9/2022, 12:57:00 AM
Positive. +1
During a House Committee on Financial Services hearing entitled "Digital Assets and the Future of Finance: The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets’ Report on Stablecoins", Rep. Meeks is asking questions about American competitiveness and racial inclusion in financial services: "A core recommendation of the president's working group is to require stablecoin issuers to be insured depository institutions. So my question is to what extent was this recommendation, analyzed in the context of the President's executive order on promoting competition, as well as his executive order on racial equity? It occurs to me that limiting stablecoin issuance to insured depository institutions, which have a high barrier to entry could limit competition. Furthermore given the disproportionate amount of people of color that gravitate to non-bank financial institutions, such recommendations could have a racial equity impact. So did the working group, consider this recommendation's impact on both competition and racing equity?" He continues: "You know, there are certainly areas of regulatory gap when it comes to this new type of payment system and technology, and there are also tremendous ways we can use stablecoins to help Underbanked communities and as Chair Waters said, I'm Chair Foreign Affairs. So also well it could help communities abroad who may be facing turmoil, in their home countries. We're hearing about NGOs who can assist refugees with assessing their cost in their new country with the use of stablecoins. Moreover, the population of a country in distress can access a mobile crypto wallet and the government cannot get to it, making it a great use case for humanitarian aid and relief. So how can the Treasury assist some of those NGOs and partnership with stablecoin issuers to help get humanitarian aid out to these populations safely and efficiently? And is there anything that Congress can do to assist in this area?"
Reference LinkSubmitted By: Anonymous